(Office of the Head of Department, Dress Code Department. The HOD is seated at his desk, across from ayosogunro, glowering at a sheaf of papers, after a brief silence, he raises his head and speaks.)
HOD: You’re Ayo Sogunro, with matric number 010601253, currently in your 400 level, (he pauses expecting a response and getting none) will you answer me please?
ayosogunro: Oh, I thought you were making a statement and not asking a question, in any case you’re right sir, that’s my name, matric number and level.
HOD: (Frowning) Reports have reached my office that you consistently refuse to comply with the regulation dress code, and this is despite several warnings to you from the officers of this department.
ayosogunro: That’s correct sir.
HOD: And that your attitude has, among other things, led to your being dismissed from several classes by some lecturers thereby disturbing the said classes and distracting the lecturers, and that your conduct has encouraged students in lower levels to wear casual clothing and that, not least of all, you dared to wear non-regulation dress at official functions involving this faculty including a wake service for a former dean of the faculty where your informal dressing disturbed the uniformity of law students present and caused the faculty great embarrassment.
ayosogunro: Why, I didn’t realize I was so notorious.
HOD: Well as you know, this department was created to monitor student compliance with dress code regulations in the faculty, and anybody found wanting will have jeopardised their chances of being admitted to the Law School, or in extreme cases, have their admission terminated. But according to administrative requirements, before we impose disciplinary action, an affected student will be given a hearing before a decision is reached. In the paper before me, you have been charged with insubordination to faculty regulations and gross misconduct, and you have I am empowered to recommend you to face the Panel for Dress Code Enforcement. But I will give you the opportunity of stating to me why my department should not bring you before the panel. You may have your statement taken orally right away in a recorded session, or you may deliver it in writing within 24 hours. Which do you prefer?
ayosogunro: I prefer to have it oral and have it done now.
HOD: Good, let’s get it over and done with. Now, why do you refuse compliance with the dress code requirements, do you have an aversion for formal dressing?
ayosogunro: No, I do not have an aversion for formal dressing, I just don’t like the idea of wearing formal dress almost every day of my student life. But that is not the reason why I do not dress in the white and black dress code. I refuse the regulation dress because the very nature of it is contrary to the study of law and in fact, other disciplines. It is alright for lawyers who choose to practice the law in law courts to dress formally, but to restrict people who study the law to wearing a particular kind of dress on the basis that that restriction will enable them become good lawyers is not only absurd but cruel.
HOD: What, don’t you want to be a good lawyer, is that cruel?
ayosogunro: First, not every body who studies law intends to practice it, some study law for the mere pleasure of it, others study it to be able to teach others, and more others study it with no idea what to do with it. I venture to say that less than half of those who study law eventually practice it, and even then, fewer actually step into the law courts. To impose a dress code on 100% law students because 50% to 20% of those students are going to be using it is clearly absurd. As for cruelty, I’m a believer in liberalism, and in this world, the study of any discipline requires the freedom of the mind, and the unshackling of thought; now freedom of thought and censorship of expression are concepts which do not go hand in hand. Students, mind you sir, I said students not lawyers, whose expression has been curtailed will find it hard to free their minds. The ultimate form of thought is action, and where there is no possibility for action, there will be less need for thought. In fact, you will notice that it is students who comply most with the regulation dress that also comply the most with the lecturers’ words—whether sensible or not, and ultimately, they become the kind of citizens who comply mindlessly with political irresponsibility without challenging them. And this conformity is exactly is what is destroying our country.
HOD: Stop there, young man. Are you so concerned with your unproved theories that you forget practical issues? One of the duties of the university is to turn out morally sound students. Will you have the future leaders of the country go around in leather mini-skirts and spaghetti tops?
ayosogunro: Yes, if they are comfortable dressing in leathers and spaghetti. You cannot force people to have a set pattern of behaviour when their own nature rebels against it. It is said that ‘a person forced against his will is of the same opinion still’. Applying this to university students; if we continue at this trend, at the end of the day what you will produce will be a lot of rogues in gentlemen’s clothing—a factor which explains why despite centuries of decent formal dressing, lawyers are still held in contempt and disregard in the western world.
But if you allow every student to dress according to their hearts’ content, not only will you be allowing the natural freedom of expression, you also will be inevitably separating the wheat from the chaff. Students who are naturally inclined to a sense of decency which the law upholds will be noticed, and those who are not will be noticed as well. It will then be left for society to choose whose fashion sense it prefers to do business with at the end of the day. But where you force everybody to dress the same, you will be ultimately telling a lie to society to the effect that ‘all these students are decent students, see how they dress’ and that will be unfair to the general public.
And anyway, sir, without disrespect, you will notice that you said ‘mini skirts and spaghetti tops’ a statement which clearly shows the direction of this whole dress code idea—that is, it is simply anti-female. I believe it is an embarrassment to us as intellectuals if, after our so-called enlightenment, we still see women as sex objects, because it is only a person who sees a woman as nothing but a sex tool that is drawn to the covering—or uncovering—of her skin. Such a retrogressive defines the character of a woman by her ability to hide her sexual appeal—not whether she is kind, honest or responsible. A cultured person does not judge a woman’s character by the dress she wears, nor is it the first thing he appreciates about her. The big point of promoting a sense of decency basically arises from the fact that some men just can’t keep their hands off the direction of their eyes.
In an all-male school, few lecturers will be uncomfortable if all the students were to turn up in fitted jeans. But let a female student do the same and you will begin to see frowns of ‘non compliance’.
HOD: Are you insulting the lecturers of this faculty, the Law School heads, are you disregarding tradition?
ayosogunro: I am sorry if I’ve said anything wrong, but if I’m right I can’t be sorry. Any reasonable intellectual will see sense in what I have said; after all, the most compliant lecturers do not necessarily make the best teachers. I dare say the less sure of themselves some lecturers are, the more attention they give to the way they look in front of their students.
And anyway, I don’t believe in being traditional, I only believe in being rational, if the tradition is reasonable, then of course I comply. That is not to say I am always rational, I only try to be, sometimes I still practice tradition—like wearing my wristwatch on my left hand. (Laughs)
HOD: Don’t be funny. And anyway, you have not convinced me, I am sorry to say. That means you will have to face the panel, and from what I know, you stand little chance of escaping. By the way, isn’t it easier to just wear the blasted white and black than be in this mess. What does it cost you?
ayosogunro: Thanks for your concern sir, but I only wear white and black when reason dictates I do so, in other words when the regulation of the faculty coincides with my own rationale. I will not surrender my ideas merely because a panel thinks they are wrong. I have to get a sounder argument first and if I have to pay the price for my stubbornness, I will do so. Let me tell you of two great Americans, Ralph Waldo Emerson and Henry David Thoreau. When Thoreau was placed in prison for refusing to pay taxes, he was visited by Emerson, and Emerson said: ‘David, what are you doing in jail?’ and Thoreau replied: ‘Ralph, what are you doing outside, when honest people are in jail for their ideals?’
HOD: In that case, this meeting is over, you can go, and await the letter summoning you before the panel.
Follow @ayosogunro on twitter where he inspires even more non-conformism. 🙂
This is so good. HOD is not as expected afterall. Give it to all d HOD dat are too good in keeping useless n obsolete tradition outside of reason.
🙂 HOD must get promoted.
The mentality of that HOD is the mentality of more than 95% of all Nigerian lecturers that I have come across. It’s a fucking shame.
Nice lines of reasoning, Ayo. I used to critic Nigerian lawyers for sticking with the formal attire too, but my point was because it had more to do with our previous colonial leaders, and should be scrapped; or modified into dressing that’s more suited to the Nigerian culture.
Hahahaha. its a fucking shame. Darzall. 🙂
LOL! Tell me this is fiction Ayo.
Not quite sha. I got reprimanded only.
Ayo Sogunro is just a rebel. Go and start a political party please! I’ll register
Majority of students aren’t comfortable with most modern laws in our universities e.g I.D card laws, dress code to mention but a few. There’s always the desire to challenge authorities on these laws. But, the graveyard is filled with past non conformist. Just pointing this out to a neo-conformist with wipe out all the spirit of conformism in the individual. Nice write up though, because non conformism is our liberation from this mess Nigeria is in.
yeah. the travails of work and the burdens of economy kills idealism faster than tradition itself.
Brilliantly written. Just brilliant!
You do have effrontery Ayodele.
I dont think this article is about dress code but about freedoms to choose and to decide based on rational or irrational thought. Everyone asks for freedoms but not all freedoms are expedient, neither are all rules and regulations.
“And anyway, sir, without disrespect, you will notice that you said ‘mini skirts and spaghetti tops’ a statement which clearly shows the direction of this whole dress code idea—that is, it is simply anti-female. I believe it is an embarrassment to us as intellectuals if, after our so-called enlightenment, we still see women as sex objects, because it is only a person who sees a woman as nothing but a sex tool that is drawn to the covering—or uncovering—of her skin. Such a retrogressive defines the character of a woman by her ability to hide her sexual appeal—not whether she is kind, honest or responsible. A cultured person does not judge a woman’s character by the dress she wears, nor is it the first thing he appreciates about her. The big point of promoting a sense of decency basically arises from the fact that some men just can’t keep their hands off the direction of their eyes.” – This is simply wonderful!
I love the way your mind works. This is the problem with our educational system. We are groomed to swallow whatever trash is stuffed down our throats without question. If education cant make one ask questions against ideas that go against all logic and rationality, then whats the point? Education is meant to fashion our minds to question and make decisions, not to become zombies. This is why we are where we are today as a nation.
Thanks for this thought-provoking one.
Excellent comment, sir. 🙂
I love people who actually use their minds, who exercise the power of it. Ayo is one of the few I know. Kudos
Thumbs up bro….nice write up…..love d last verse…..***what are you doing outside, when honest people are in jail for their ideals?’*** God bless ur handwork
Been a long time I read something as intellectually provoking!
This is surely a product of a fertile mind. I love the practical feel to the writing. So much effrontery.
All in all, Neo-conformism is like asking a herd of animals(elephants, giraffee, tigers, snakes, fishes, snail etct) to compete in the race of climbing a tree. Who wins? Your guess is as good as mine!
More grease brother!
Ayo, I have to say, this piece is…
Thank you so so so much for addressing the issue of the imbalance in gender as it relates to dress code, it’s like you read the mind of the entirety of liberal ladies every where. I will infact add, that these people who are also us, assume that men are weak willed creatures incapable of self-control and at the same time want to place him up. When you sum it all up, the imbalance in dress regulations as it relates to both men and women is an insult to both gender and favors no one. I always love to read your stuff. Now I’ll spend this entire week laughing because I read this!!!
Pingback: 7 Steps to Succeeding in Corporate America | Job Cafe Inc
#Gbam again, couldn’t spare time to read when u posted but I’m glad I finally did. Conformity is our bane; we often prescribe one medicine in the hope that it will cure all. It doesn’t. I once submitted my ID card form and I was mandated to fill in my hall of residence. I told them I don’t stay there, I didn’t even ask for allocation or know where the damn hall is. Why should I fill in a detail I didn’t have? They didn’t care; such was their way. So I filled in some random info and submitted even though I was sick to my stomach for doing so. I let them know too.
Prednisone 120 Mg Side Effects Lamotrigine Canada Generic Nosebleed Vitamin C Bloody Noses [url=https://archive.org/details/OrderXanaxCodOvernightShipping ]Order Xanax With Paypal[/url]. And Stamina Herbal Viagra Clindamycin Inducible Resistance Spironolactone Drug Test False Positive Liver Biopsy Methotrexate . Proskauer And Avodart Is Valtrex Dangerous . No Prescription Buy Cheap Sporanox Levothyroxine Side Affects [url=https://archive.org/details/TramadolCodOvernightDelivery ]Tramadol Non Prescription Fedex Overnight Free[/url] Lipitor No Prescription Online Purchase Arthritis In Hips Headache Cartia Emploi Consultation Lexapro Binge Eating Disorder
Regardless of what style you prefer, the quality is something that
really counts when keeping your home safe and secure.
It often comes in two varieties one with dual flexible sides and one that has
a hard side and a flexible side that looks a lot like wood
molding. You may want to check the batteries to see if they are
I’m curious to find out what blog platform
you have been using? I’m having some minor security issues with my latest website and I would like
to find something more secure. Do you have any solutions?
I loved this! Why black and white everyday? Frustrating and terribly inconvenient. Superb one, Sir.
So I was searching for appropriate dressing styles for delivering public speeches and debates and I came across this.
I am a Law student and I have to wear white and black almost everyday but maybe it’s just me, but I’m proud of this distinct dress code and I don’t see what’s annoying or frustrating about it. Wearing white and black is a pride for me anyway though your arguments are reasonable… Lawyers don’t even wear white and black. But imagine how silly Law students would look wearing crop tops and crazy jeans and all of that. Black and white is what defines and separates us and we should be proud of it and pay this little sacrifice for our dreams.
Ayo, Please complete your story here. I am interested in the consequences of your perceived stubbornness.